It is not over until the fat lady sing’s!

•November 24, 2008 • 1 Comment

Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) Justice David Souter has agreed that a review of the federal lawsuit filed by attorney Phil Berg against Barack Hussein Obama II, et al., which was subsequently dismissed for lack of standing is warranted.

SCOTUS Docket No. 08-570 contains the details.

A review of that docket and the Rule 10 of the Supreme Court makes abundantly clear that Justice Souter’s granting of a review on the Writ of Certiorari is not a right entitled to citizen Phil Berg, but rather is a matter of judicial discretion based upon a compelling reason. That compelling reason is the Constitutional requirement that ;

“No person except a natural born citizen…shall be eligible to the office of President…”

What this means is that on or before 1 DECEMBER 2008 Barack Hussein Obama II must respond to the writ of certiorari, and since the Berg v Obama case hinged primarily on the question of Obama’s place of birth, it is almost inconceivable that Barack Obama will thumb his nose at the Justices of the Supreme Court and he is absolutely compelled to provide a vault copy of his original birth certificate.

Another very salient fact to consider at this time is that, despite all of the pronouncements of the print and broadcast media, Barack Obama is not yet the President-elect of the United States.

Barack Obama can only become the President-elect after the Electoral College convenes on 15 DECEMBER 2008 in their respective state capitals around the nation and cast their votes to elect the President and the Vice President. As you can see this election day occurs two weeks after the required response to the Supreme Court granted Writ of Certiorari.

The bottom line is this: the presidential election of 2008 remains an ongoing process, the outcome of which remains undetermined, and all talk about a potential Constitutional crisis in the United States are at least 36 days premature.

The inevitable constitutional crisis regarding President-elect Obama, of course, revolves around his inability (or unwillingness) to produce an authentic Hawaiian birth certificate with the raised certificate stamp that the Federal Elections Commission can independently verify.

Here are some of the unanswered issues hanging over the head of President-elect Barack Obama and the question of his American citizenship:

* The allegation that Obama was born in Kenya to parents unable to automatically grant him American citizenship;

* The allegation that Obama was made a citizen of Indonesia as a child and that he retained foreign citizenship into adulthood without recording an oath of allegiance to regain any theoretical American citizenship;

* The allegation that Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and that he may not be an eligible, natural-born citizen;

* The allegation that Obama was not born an American citizen; lost an hypothetical American citizenship he had as a child; that Obama may not now be an American citizen and even if he is, may hold dual citizenships with other countries. If any, much less all, of these allegations are true, the suit claims, Obama cannot constitutionally serve as president.

* The allegations that “Obama’s grandmother on his father’s side, half brother and half sister claim Obama was born in Kenya,” the suit states.”

Reports reflect Obama’s mother went to Kenya during her pregnancy; however, she was prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to Hawaii at her late stage of pregnancy, which apparently was a normal restriction to avoid births during flight. Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) gave birth to Obama in Kenya, after which she flew to Hawaii and registered Obama’s birth.”

* The claim could not be verified by inquiries to Hawaiian hospitals since state law bars the hospitals from releasing medical records to the public;

* Even if Obama produced authenticated proof of his birth in Hawaii, however, the suit claims that the U.S. Nationality Act of 1940 provided that minors lose their American citizenship when their parents expatriate. Since Obama’s mother married an Indonesian citizen and moved to Indonesia, the suit claims, she forfeited both her and Barack’s American citizenship.

Alan Stang, now let’s see someone try to impeach this man’s credibili

•November 22, 2008 • Leave a Comment

 

BLACK  

GUILT REVOLUTION, FROM WHITE TO

 

by Alan Stang

PLEASE  FORWARD 

Y

 

I know that he could still actually be a Muslim and that he has participated in disgusting, degenerate sexual practices. I know he has been a British subject and an Indonesian citizen and therefore is ineligible to be President of the United States. I know he has used cocaine, like his predecessor, Communist world government traitor Jorge W. Boosh. I know he is the property of Goldman Sachs.
 

In fact, Stephen Coffman retired as Resident Agent in Charge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Galveston, Texas office after thirty two years of government service. For many of those years his security clearance was Secret and even higher. In the latest outrage, Coffman has examined the Selective Service System paperwork filed in Hussein’s name, and told me that it is riddled with forgeries, still another felony. Get in touch with me if you would like to see his phony SSS card.
 

Again, “Barack Hussein Obama” is a concoction, a biological version of a department store manikin, manufactured on a lathe to be tall, handsome and charming, blessed with a beautiful black-preacher voice, a man who has more names than a woman – Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham – and more nationalities than a virus, as impossible to authenticate as it is to nail a cow pie to a wall.
 

To work for the upcoming Hussein Administration, you must fill out a seven-page single spaced questionnaire that demands more information that an F.B.I. full-field investigation, but Hussein has concealed everything about himself and the only thing we do know about him is phony. Hussein should be required to fill out his own form.
 

In some respects, Comrade Hussein reminds me of the late New York comedian Al Kelly. Al’s “shtick” was talking literal gibberish, meaningless syllables, but he did it so artfully, inserting real words here and there, and did it with such total personal authority, that you thought your confusion was your own fault. Organizations would hire Al to do this to unsuspecting conventioneers.
 

On one occasion, at a medical convention, someone made the electrifying announcement that “Emil Hassenpfeffer, M.D.,” the world famous psychiatrist, had been flown there from Vienna to address the physicians. They should have suspected something when “Hassenpfeffer” appeared before them in a white coat and stethoscope, but they did not. Sadly, I wasn’t there, but I’m told that Al laid them in the aisles. So impressive was his presentation that the appreciative doctors gave him a standing ovation. Al could reduce the strongest man to helpless, quivering protoplasm.
 

Because Hussein cannot prove he is a “natural born citizen,” which the Constitution requires of a President, more and more Americans presently are in court, trying to prevent his inauguration. New Jersey attorney Leo Donofrio goes one better than Philadelphia lawyer Phil Berg. Remember that Phil is in court arguing that Hussein is not natural born because he was born in Mombasa, not Honolulu. Hussein’s grandmother says she was there.
 

Constitutional authority Leo argues that it doesn’t matter where he was born. On one of his own web sites, Hussein himself admits he was also born a British national – because that is what his father was – and because of that tainted citizenship he cannot be a natural born American. As I write, lawyer Donofrio has put the matter before U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
 

Yes, it would have been a consummate delight to elect a black President who is an American. In a previous piece, I suggested economist Tom Sowell, whom I interviewed for a couple of hours in studio. Tom is brilliant, charming, much blacker, as I recall, than manikin Hussein, and, guess what! We know where he was born, in North Carolina. (He was raised in Harlem, where I myself lived while I attended Columbia University.) Among his many advantages is that he has never been elected to anything and is not a politician. Hey, Tom, I’m still waiting for you to respond.
 

But forget all that for the moment if you can. Consider that, in this case, we are the first major nation to elect a black (or at least a biracial) man head of state. After all the clever Socialist mouthings, that achievement knocks European pipsqueaks like Gordon Brown and Nick Sarkozy on their keisters and Merkel on her knockwurst. It totally discredits the smelly canards about our country’s human values. Hey, Gordon, Nick, Angela! Now let’s see you elect a rag head!
 
Indeed, only now, a few weeks after the shock, are we coming to understand what the (s)election has done. Before it, the paltry, remaining credibility of our Communist media was already in the toilet. During the campaign, they could not contain their fanaticism, twisting stories, concocting others, suppressing facts and outright lying, to such an extent that they appeared to be Hussein publicists.
 
Of course, my favorite example remains degenerate Chris Matthews, who says a thrill runs up his leg whenever he thinks about Hussein. Now, not surprisingly, Chris says he may run for office. Because of all this, our Communist media now enjoy even less credibility than they did before. The big newspapers and networks are laying people off.
 

These people are enemies of America and should be treated as such

.

 
But the biggest effect of the Hussein scam is – Hallelujah! – the complete, irrevocable end of white guilt. The presence in our country of many black millionaires, even billionaires, military men and lawmakers could not end it. The influence Oprah enjoys as one of the richest women in America could not end it.
 

The fact that Bill Cosby is generally considered a national treasure could not end it. But the (s)election of Hussein as President – as high as you can go – inevitably must. You can have blacks who are suppressed or blacks who run the country. You can’t have both. A President Hussein who is getting ready to install reparations under another name – Marx’s redistribution of wealth – makes white guilt preposterous and impossible.
 

White men! Awake and sing! Stop cringing! Stand tall in the light. You have been absolved. You can thank Illegal Alien-Elect Hussein for the fact that you no longer are implicated in the crimes a few white men you are not descended from and don’t know anything about committed more than 140 years ago. You no longer need to apologize. The generations of oppression you have endured are over. You’re free! Thank God Almighty, you’re free at last!
 

Imagine the cascading effects of that liberation. Now you can stop voting for school bond issues until the textbooks no longer blame the white man for every problem from asthma to zits. Now you no longer need fade in the face of black intimidation. Indeed, such intimidation should quickly disappear because the end of white guilt should drive con men like fraudster Al Sharpton and shakedown artist Jesse Jackson, who thrive on it and promote it, out of business.
 

You can stop shrieking mea culpas because of the nightmare in the ‘hood, where learning is disdained. You can admit that biological males who spend their days nodding mindlessly on street corners attired in prison rape pants several sizes too big – pants that would fall to their ankles if they do not hold them up – are not real men.
 
You can recognize that white men do not sneak into the ‘hood at night to impregnate unmarried black women with the result that most black babies born there lack the benefits of wedlock. When you recognize that, those black men will have to admit that, yes, they are inferior; not because of discrimination but because they are losers. Yes, the problem can be solved, but only by strong, black Christian men.
 

I once spent an evening with economist Walter Williams. He is brilliant, charming and much blacker than Illegal-Alien Elect Hussein. I wish we could trick him into becoming President. Hey, Walter, why not run for the nomination against Tom Sowell? Professor Williams says this, “Maybe the election of a black president will help white people over their guilt feelings so they can stop acting like fools in their relationships with black people.” Hey, white folks! Do you hear? Stop acting like fools with black people! Enough!
 

At some point, Obamatrons will awaken from the present mass hypnosis engendered by our Communist schools and media. This is already starting to happen. Jerry Mazza, associate editor of Online Journal, is a typical New York “liberal” and a virulent Obamatron. Here is only a small part of his November twelfth lament. You should go to Online Journal and read it all:
 

Barack, my brother. Mr. President-elect, what is going through your head? Rahm Israel Emmanuel for White House Chief of Staff? . . . You are hanging out with guys whose rap sheets go deeper than anyone you met in South Chicago. Like Larry Summers, key lobbyist for the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act . . . . David Rockefeller’s boy! . . He’s as toxic as Paulson and then some.”
 

And Timothy Geithner, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the powerhouse financial institution in America. Tim, former Clinton Treasury official, ex-employee of Kissinger Associations, senior exec at the IMF, shapes finance policy behind the scenes, hangs with the Council on Foreign Relations. Do you really want him around?”
 

Jerry Mazza cites some other Clinton leftovers, agrees that Hussein is appointing to solve the financial disaster the same people who caused it and says Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street predators were among his biggest contributors. He concludes: “Say it isn’t so, Barack. Say it isn’t so
 

The best and the brightest think you’re hanging with the worst and the weirdest. And the train ain’t out of the station, my man. I mean my President-To-Be. I voted for you, dude, twice, at least; convinced my family and friends. Pumped you up in my articles. Don’t make me look like a horse’s ass. You have the power. You have it in you to provide better than this for the working and middle class families whose butts you want to save. These guys don’t have a clue of what it is to ride the A-train at 8 A.M. or not take a limo or a private jet wherever they’re going. Or go without, period.”
 

“Go for it, my brother. Don’t make me look like another stupid white man. Don’t let them turn you. Don’t break our hearts.”
Jerry, Jerry, Jerry, you are another stupid white man. You are a horse’s ass. You have earned the coming disillusionment and contempt of your family and friends. Isn’t this exactly what my colleagues and I warned you about, day after day for more than a year? Aren’t these the people we told you he would pick because these are the people who finance and control him? Isn’t this exactly what we told you would happen? Even now, although you are finally aware of the facts, you can’t put them together.
 

Now here comes Democrat feminist Camille Paglia. In salon.com, Professor Camille says this: “In the closing weeks of the election, however, I became increasingly disturbed by the mainstream media’s avoidance of forthright dealing with several controversies that had been dogging Obama . . . . For example, I had thought for many months that the flap over Obama’s birth certificate was a tempest in a teapot. But simple questions about the certificate were never resolved to my satisfaction
 

But Obama could have ended the entire matter months ago by publicly requesting Hawaii to issue a fresh, long-form, stamped certificate and inviting a few high-profile reporters in to examine the document and photograph it. . . . And why has Obama not made his university records or thesis work widely available? . . . We don’t need another presidency that finds it all too easy to rely on evasion or stonewalling. I deeply admire Obama, but as a voter I don’t like feeling gamed or played.”
 

These are just a couple of early toadstools. They will multiply as “liberal” intellectools become aware that Illegal Alien-Elect Hussein – like el Presidente Jorge W. Boosh – is just another front man for the same people, who conduct the conspiracy for world government
 

Next, Hussein voters in the ‘hood, who voted for him because he is “black,” who don’t know and don’t care what he believes, who don’t know which party controls the Congress, who have never heard of Madam Peelousy, will discover not only that Hussein will not pay their mortgages, but that he will also make their electricity rates skyrocket when he forces the coal companies into bankruptcy.

 

Remember, he said himself that is what he will do. Regular readers know this is part of the Communist program to shut America down and bring it to its knees. When those voters are shivering because they can’t pay their electricity bills, remember that this is what they voted for, so they have what they wanted.

 

es, I know that Illegal Alien-Elect Hussein is a Communist. I know his financial peculations could land most others in jail. I know that, because he has concealed everything about himself and lied about it, we know less about him than we did about every other candidate elected to the Oval Office.

But here is the thing that really scares me. When it becomes so apparent what Hussein really is that even a horse’s ass can see, when the media-engendered hypnosis wears off, when he begins drafting young people into Der Hussein Youth, and on and on, will all this provoke a new wave of hatred for blacks? Will enough whites to create a problem blame the blacks and say that the noble experiment has failed?

 © 2008 – Alan Stang – All Rights Reserved

Alan Stang was one of Mike Wallace’s original writers at Channel 13 in New York, where he wrote some of the scripts that sent Mike to CBS. Stang has been a radio talk show host himself. In Los Angeles, he went head to head nightly with Larry King, and, according to Arbitron, had almost twice as many listeners. He has been a foreign correspondent. He has written hundreds of feature magazine articles in national magazines and some fifteen books, for which he has won many awards, including a citation from the Pennsylvania House of Representatives for journalistic excellence.
 
One of Stang’s exposés stopped a criminal attempt to seize control of New Mexico, where a gang seized a court house, held a judge hostage and killed a deputy. The scheme was close to success before Stang intervened. Another Stang exposé inspired major reforms in federal labor legislation.
 

His first book, It’s Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights, was an instant best-seller. His first novel, The Highest Virtue, set in the Russian Revolution, won smashing reviews and five stars, top rating, from the West Coast Review of Books, which gave five stars in only one per cent of its reviews.
 

Stang has lectured in every American state and around the world and has guested on many top shows, including CNN’s Cross Fire. Because he and his wife had the most kids in Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic, where they lived at the time, the entire family was chosen to be actors in “Havana,” directed by Sydney Pollack and starring Robert Redford, the most expensive movie ever made (at the time). Alan Stang is the man in the ridiculous Harry Truman shirt with the pasted-down hair. He says they made him do it.

 

 

 

To forestall that dangerous possibility, we need to keep explaining that color has nothing to do with it. Hussein is not a Communist front man because he is “black,” but because he is a Communist. This time, let’s put the guilt where it belongs.

A MUST read! A MUST forward!

•November 13, 2008 • Leave a Comment

 

UNPRECEDENTED RAPE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE UNDERWAY IN DC

 

 

PART 1 of 2

 
November 13, 2008

By: Devvy

© 2008 – NewsWithViews.com
 

Rape is an ugly word usually attributed to an attack on a woman. It also means an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation: the rape of the countryside.
 

There is no other word to describe what has been happening in Washington, DC., for the past two and a half months. The so-called bail out of lending institutions and banks has turned into a free for all that is mind boggling, already running in the TRILLIONS with no end in sight.
 
As the layers have been unfolding over the past few weeks, only someone in complete denial can say with a straight face that this unconstitutional looting of the people’s labor has been anything but mass rape.
 

The Fed is thumbing their nose at Congress:

The Fed is thumbing their nose at Congress:

The Fed is thumbing their nose at Congress:

Nov. 10 (Bloomberg) — “The Federal Reserve is refusing to identify the recipients of almost $2 trillion of emergency loans from American taxpayers or the troubled assets the central bank is accepting as collateral. Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said in September they would comply with congressional demands for transparency in a $700 billion bailout of the banking system. Two months later, as the Fed lends far more than that in separate rescue programs that didn’t require approval by Congress, Americans have no idea where their money is going or what securities the banks are pledging in return.”

 

Congress foolishly gave the privately owned “FED” and Treasury total power with the bail out deal and now they’re getting their noses rubbed in it. Lending institutions who received all this borrowed, worthless paper called a ‘bail out’ or ‘rescue plan’ are spending the sweat off your back like there’s no tomorrow on big bonuses and lavish events, while Congress sits around scratching their backsides. Congress has let the genie out of the bottle and they’re now running around like the nitwits they are trying to shore up this disaster of their own making.
 

Congress never had the authority to to rob and plunder the people’s empty purse for what has turned into a

never ending bail out bonanza. Congress has no right to steal from you via heavier and heavier taxation to bail out, rescue or make loans to companies in the private sector. Well, that is until Congress, with the blessing of Bush, simply decided a little over two months ago to finally burn Art. 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. They have become totally lawless with zero restraints on their actions.

 

Congress willfully violates the U.S. Constitution now as a matter of doing business. These crooks, including Marxist Obama and Juan McCain, have simply rubber stamped the utter and complete bankruptcy of this country. It’s foolish at this point to try and sugar coat reality. The raw, hard numbers are there for anyone to see. Desperate Americans are begging for the government to bail out their industries, so they care little for the Constitution. All they want is their bacon saved. What they are embracing is totalitarian government.
 

Congress didn’t bail out ENRON. They let the seventh largest corporation with a capitalization of $60 billion dollars go under. I believe the reason is 9/11, which I have covered in other columns. However, as the mortgage melt down became epidemic, instead of letting the market correct itself, in steps a thieving government.

 
Now you are making your mortgage payment and your neighbors. As tragic as the foreclosure epidemic is, to make those of us who meet our monthly mortgage obligations and then are fleeced to pay for someone’s else’s with borrowed money is indentured servitude. We are being forced with a gun to our head to slave for someone else’s house payment. But wait! Headlines, November 12, 2008: Treasury Secretary Paulson – bail out money not to be used to buy toxic mortgages after all!

 

Did you not see this 0:26 second video of a woman cheering that Obama is going to pay her mortgage and gas? No, you will pay and the trap has already been sprung. What you’re seeing is one of the most dangerous precedents being set since FDR’s Nazi ‘New Deal.’

 
As if that’s not enough, today you will go to work to pay legal fees for these mortgage execs who covered up the truth about the financial sustainability of their corporations as well as: 86% of Bailout Money Used for Executive Bonuses.

 

The so-called bail out is already a massive failure except for the banking cartel who got total control of our banking and lending institutions once and for all. As we the people are trying to fight off an illegitimate president getting sworn into office, the world banking vipers are getting ready to finish the final wiring of our monetary and banking system into a global system. It is a death knell and soon you will hear the skeleton rattle clear across this land.
 

Bailouts: The wound that will keep on hemorrhaging: “In recent columns I have reminded people about the bail out for Chrysler – a ‘one time’ kiss from Congress back in 1981. Not so fast: “Aug. 22 2008 (Bloomberg) — General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co., Chrysler LLC and U.S. auto-parts makers are seeking $50 billion in government-backed loans, double their initial request, to develop and build more fuel-efficient vehicles …” Next year is going to be a make-or-break year in terms of survival,” said Mirko Mikelic, senior portfolio manager at Fifth Third Asset Management in Grand Rapids, Michigan, which oversees $22 billion in assets, including GM and Ford bonds. “Any help like these government loans would be a huge boost.”

 

As I write this column, these thieves in Congress are scurrying to put together unconstitutional loan packages for the auto makers. They won’t make it to next year. Who was watching the books for those companies? These mega corporations sold out the American worker decades ago, kicked them into the unemployment lines and gave American jobs to foreign countries like commie China. Now they want the sweat off your back to fund their mistakes.
 
These big auto makers have known for years their losses were in the tens of billions of dollars and could not be sustained. That’s when they should have closed their foreign plants, down sized and employed Americans in what ever factories they could keep open here in America. Of course it would help if the parking lots at GM and Ford weren’t filled with employee cars made by Toyota and other foreign companies. Now, they’re demanding you and I bail them out even though Congress has NO authority to be a loan operation for the private sector. That’s not the big story.
 

A ton of this borrowed money will be to

fund pensions. 125,000 for Chrysler and 500,000 for GM. These corporations made these obligations living beyond their means to operate and now they want unconstitutional loans. What a horrific mess created by greedy corporations who now want you, me and our children to bail out their greed.

 

Yes, the auto industry employs hundreds of thousands of people. So does China Mart (Wal Mart). So does the health care industry. Congress does not have the authority to bail out those industries, either. How many more private sector industries will be lining up for hot checks from Congress? There’s NO money in the U.S. Treasury to loan. Is anyone out there listening?
 

Don’t look to Thanksgiving and Christmas sales to save retailers. The last I looked at a CNN poll on November 11, 2008, a whopping 45% of nearly 200,000 people said they would not be doing any Christmas shopping this year. All the lay offs underway and still to come, along with the foreclosures and massive credit card defaults, there’s little money to put into the economy. This drying up of spending will continue to drain states in unemployment benefits, shrinking tax revenues and medical treatment for those without insurance. Don’t forget the MILLIONS of illegal aliens sucking off state resources. The destruction to families all across the country is a true tragedy unfolding. There is no ‘lame duck’ Congress because there will be no “new” Congress sworn in come January to “fix” things. It’s the same crooks with 17 “new” faces who will join in lockstep with their brethren.
 

Marxist Obama will bring no change because he’s putting together the

same players responsible for the banking collapse as his advisors. Obama is putting the wolves in the hen house. That is a fact for those who support Barack Hussein Obama. You have cut your own throat, you just haven’t choked on your own blood yet.

 

If this sounds rather harsh, the American people are in for the shock of their lives; the reality will begin to really settle in mid first quarter of next year. The snow ball effect of job bleeding, no credit left for over extended Americans, continued foreclosures despite all the unconstitutional maneuvers by Congress and even bankrupt states, will slam this country in a few short months. The links at the bottom are just a small number that tell the story. The incompetent, Nancy Pelosi and fellow fools are actually contemplating another move that should finally

scare the living hell out of the American people:

 

“The testimony of Teresa Ghilarducci, professor of economic policy analysis at the New School for Social Research in New York, in hearings Oct. 7 drew the most attention and criticism.
Testifying for the House Committee on Education and Labor, Ghilarducci proposed that the government eliminate tax breaks for 401(k) and similar retirement accounts, such as IRAs, and confiscate workers’ retirement plan accounts and convert them to universal Guaranteed Retirement Accounts (GRAs) managed by the Social Security Administration.”
 

Social security is a tax that goes into the general fund of the treasury and is not ear marked for any specific spending purpose. That is a fact. To even suggest the $1 trillion dollars in retirement funds be transferred over to a government who can’t balance a budget and continues to write hot checks for hundreds of billions of dollars every day of the week is the ultimate in lunacy. Tens of millions of Americans are depending on those retirement accounts to be ready when they retire. I cannot even put into words what will be the end result if such a dastardly deed is done by Congress.
 

Pelosi and Obama want a “new” stimulus package. There is NO money in the treasury. It is now overdrawn

$10,622,223,198,682.54 as I write this column. Our purse, the people’s treasury is over drawn $10.6 TRILLION and what these insane lunatics are proposing is writing more hot checks to stave off the inevitable: a major depression.

Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts — including 401(k)s and IRAs — and convert them to accounts managed by the Social Security Administration

. Triggered by the financial crisis the past two months, the hearings reportedly were meant to stem losses incurred by many workers and retirees whose 401(k) and IRA balances have been shrinking rapidly.

 

 

At the rate Washington is stealing us blind, $100 an hour will not be enough to live on and feed your family – if you have a job. A heavy, progressive taxation is the second plank of the communist manifesto. All this borrowing to give away to lending institutions and prop up failing industries has to come from some where: YOUR shrinking bank account and take home pay. The tax man cometh.
 
Congress refuses to stop the unlawful confiscation of your hard earned money by the IRS. Americans are terrified of this American version of the Nazi Gestapo with very good reason.
However, millions of Americans know that domestic Americans are not subject to the federal income tax. Congress will not come clean with the truth because they need this forced taxation against we the people to support their monstrous, unconstitutional looting of the treasury.
 

I have been in the trenches 19 years, full time, nearly seven days a week. This nation is littered with tax guru’s ripping off desperate people who bought into the oldest or newest income tax scam (

straw man, UCC, redemption, etc). The federal prisons are full of Americans who fell for these bogus arguments. There are tens of thousands of people employed by organizations who need the income tax to stay a float

. They care nothing for the law or the truth. The only way we the people will stop the unlawful taking of our labor is the same way prohibition ended: Enough people said enough.

Truth Attack is the one organization in this country where everyone can become a participant. In order to stop the plunder, you have to dry up the source of revenue being used. For new readers to my column, take time this weekend to read these two columns of mine: Why An Income Tax Isn’t Necessary to Fund the Federal Government (also available for free on audio; listen on your computer or download to your IPod or a CD and listen on the train, in your tractor or in commute traffic); and The Right Argument on Taxation. Then, go to Tommy’s web site, click here. This is where you will find what Congress and the media won’t tell you about the federal income tax and how the IRS, deliberately and with malice, extorts the sweat of your labor with lies. Don’t let someone else tell you what’s the truth, you do the research and become part of the solution.

 

 

constitutional militia be reconstituted by the states. One reader let me know that West Virginia should be included in the states to target because his state stands for freedom and has a lot of real patriots. One quick follow up: Dr. Edwin Vieira has a good inventory of his Constitutional Militia book if you can’t locate it on line; some people have had a problem finding a copy.

 

 

To say the economic situation in this country is going to get much worse is the understatement of the century. What Congress has been doing and what’s coming as a result of their treachery will put millions of Americans into shock.

 

My mail box is full everyday from Americans scared to death about what’s left in their 401(k)s and what will happen with our currency becoming more worthless by the day.

 

My mail box is full of stories of people in pain as reality is coming home to roost. It breaks my heart, but so many of us have tried our best to get the truth out while corporate media and their mouth pieces lie every day in their newspapers and on the tube.

 

 

 

 

 

Diversify some of your assets into gold. Gold is not an ATM machine, it is a long term investment. There are excellent buys out there if you talk to the right people.

 

 

In my last column, I reinforced why it is critical the

 

To order: $19.95 postpaid, by check or money payable to Edwin Vieira, Jr. at 52 Stonegate Court, Front Royal, Virginia 22630.

 

PLEASE demand Bush pardon U.S. Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Campean. Pray Bush has one ounce of humanity left. Let your voice be heard,

 

PLEASE demand Bush pardon U.S. Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Campean. Pray Bush has one ounce of humanity left. Let your voice be heard,

 

PLEASE demand Bush pardon U.S. Border Patrol Agents Ramos and Campean. Pray Bush has one ounce of humanity left. Let your voice be heard,

 

click here. For part two click below.

 

 

Links. This is just a short list

1 -

Postal Service Looks To Cut 40,000 Jobs First Layoffs In History
2 -
Circuit City files for bankruptcy
3 -
Mervyn’s going out of business closing 149 stores
4 -
Linens & Things closing all 371 of its stores
5 -
DHL to cut 9,500 jobs and close service centers
6 -
Jobless ranks hit 10 million, most in 25 years
7 -
Retailers Report a Sales Collapse
8 -
American Express seeking $3.5 billion as part of government bailout program

1 -

$1 BILLION Tax Fraud? IRS Says ‘Oh Well’
2 -
Federal Reserve is Stealing Iraqi Oil Revenues
3 -
Okay for banks to break the law; Justice Dept shrugs shoulders
4 -
The “Dirty Little Secret” Of the US Bank Bailout
5 -
Hell, Meet Handbasket
6 -
Bailout Fixes Nothing, Banking System Collapse Approaches Climax
7 -
One In Five US Mortgages Now Underwater
8 -
SoCal Foreclosure Nightmare
9 -
Growing credit crisis claims more victims
10 -
STARBUCKS profit drops 97%
11 -
A Quiet Windfall For U.S. Banks
12 -
Manufacturing hits 26-year low

hinting that recession has begun

Downturn Clobbers Public Pension Funds
2 -
Bloomberg Picks a Fight With the Federal Reserve

Short videos

1 -

Fox Business: Gerald Celente Predicts Revolution
2 - “Obamanomics”
Will Accelerate Economic Collapse and Great Depression
3 -
CNBC Analyst Blames ‘Illuminati’ For Crisis

 
 

 

UNPRECEDENTED RAPE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE UNDERWAY IN DC

 

 

 

PART 2 of 2

 

Update on the constitutional crisis: Obama can’t prove he is a natural born citizen
 

1 -

I am waiting on my FOIAs. I sent a final letter to James Burrus, Chief Investigator for Election Fraud at the FBI. The FBI does not comment on investigations, so we will not know if anything has been done in the name of justice. Regular readers of my columns have been following this mess. If you are a new reader, you can catch up here

.

click here for details

.

Phil’s web site

.

Details on his web site

.

This site also keeps on up Martin’s suit

.

Details click here

.

Details click here

.

Details click here

.

click on the box with your state

.

Click here

.

This is Leo’s site. You will see he’s in a real dog fight and he’s fighting for what’s right. I asked Leo to put together a short paper explaining the misconduct going on at the high court. This is his full explanation; click here. Please take time over the weekend or over lunch at work to read this; shouldn’t take but about ten minutes. It will sicken you.

 

If you scroll down about 3/4th of the way to the bottom of Leo’s site, this begins details on his lawsuit and you will see standing was NOT challenged in the lower courts. Section begins with:
 

US Supreme Court case: New Jersey Voter vs. Obama and McCain on “natural born citizen: status.”
 

Nov.11.2008 @ 10:29 am

United States Supreme Court Docket #: 08A407
United States Supreme Court Application for Emergency Stay and supporting brief: ScotusStayAppBrief.doc
 

* * * *

Leo Donofrio is a retired attorney who had many years in full practice. He’s an ace golfer and now a professional poker player. You might recognize Leo from the World Series of Poker. Leo is mad and he’s a fighter. All Leo attempted to do was the right thing and now his life has become a night mare, but he is not backing down.
 

All of us need to help him because what’s going on, not just with Obama, but with the courts is simply not acceptable. Only intense heat from we the people is going to make the difference.
 

Write a polite letter to Justice Clarence Thomas. No phone calls as the clerks will not take messages. I sent my letter to Justice Thomas today over night mail because time is short. You can use regular snail mail, but please get it done and in the mail by Monday. If 100,000 letters land on Justice Thomas’ desk next week, things are going to happen. This is what Leo suggests from his web site:
 

The best thing you can do to help this case before Justice Clarence Thomas is to write to him and the other justices.
 

The Honorable Associate Justice Clarence Thomas
United States Supreme Court
One First Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20543.
 

Please include the docket # 08A407, and the URL to

this blog

[Below is the original post. Thank you for your help.]

Supreme Court of the United States – Clerk’s Office Continues Sabotage of New Jersey Citizen Stay Application for 08 Election. Your help is requested.
 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Citizens of the United States of America, I need your help and the US needs your help.
 
My case, LEO C. DONOFRIO v. NINA MITCHELL WELLS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY – US Supreme Court Docket # 08A407 – continues to be subjected to misconduct by the US Supreme Court Clerk’s office, particularly by Mr. Danny Bickell, the Stay Clerk.
 

For a full review of the Judicial treachery in this case, please review the entire UNORTHODOX PROCEDURAL HISTORY of the case.
 

It has come to my attention today that the US Supreme Court’s Stay Clerk, Mr. Danny Bickell, has continued to list this case incorrectly thereby preventing it from ever crossing the desk of Justice Clarence Thomas.

The Docket of the case fails to mention that the case went directly from the Appellate Division in New Jersey to the New Jersey Supreme Court which is the nexus that allows the case to be properly before the US Supreme Court. The Clerk’s office appears to be doing everything possible to see that this case never gets to the desk of Justice Clarence Thomas or any of the other Supreme Court Justices.

 
I have an order handed down from the New Jersey Supreme Court which makes reference to the Appellate Division case as well, but the US Supreme Court Clerk’s office refuses to acknowledge the NJ Supreme Court’s review and it is that review which allows my case to go before the US Supreme Court.
 
The Appellate Division case avoided the Constitutional issue, but the NJ Supreme Court decision raised the Constitutional issue when it specifically said in its order of denial that it had relied on “movant’s papers” while at the same time it made no mention of Judge Sabatino’s Appellate Division order and opinion.
 

The NJ Supreme Court specifically relied upon “movant’s papers” in their order denying emergency relief and “movants papers” focused on the “natural born citizen” issue.

 

 

 

Here is the decision of the Honorable Justice Virginia A. Long:

“This matter having come before the court on an application for emergent relief pursuant to Rule 2:9-8, and the undersigned having reviewed the movant’s papers and the papers filed by the defendant in the Superior Court, Appellate Division, it is hereby Ordered that the application for emergent relief is denied.”

 

The US Supreme Court Docket fails to mention the NJ Supreme Court decision and that is completely wrong and improper. This case continues to be subjected to Judicial/Clerical misconduct and it’s time that US Citizens, be they Democrat, Republican or 3rd party affiliated, stand up and order that the Clerk’s office of the highest Court in the land STOP interfering in a case that is rightly before the US Supreme Court.

 

 

 

This is unprecedented in that the Clerk’s office at the SCOTUS appears to be injecting politics into the handling of paperwork properly before it. It will be a terrible blow to the separation of powers if Supreme Court review can be stopped by Clerks imposing their own political views on litigants who have properly followed legal procedure.

 

 

 

 

 

Justice Clarence Thomas and the rest of the Supreme Court must receive direct mail letters (not e mail) bringing this case Docket # and the URL of my blog to their attention.

 

 

If you write to Chief Justice Roberts, please make sure the envelope is addressed to: The Honorable John G. Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States

 

Thank you, Leo C. Donofrio
 

© 2008 – NewsWithViews.com – All Rights Reserved
 

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy belongs to no organization.
 

She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn’t left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her web site (

www.devvy.com

) contains a tremendous amount of information, solutions and a vast Reading Room.

Devvy’s website:

www.devvy.com

 

Before you send Devvy e-mail, please take the time to check the FAQ section on her

web site. It is filled with answers to frequently asked questions and links to reliable research sources.

 

E-mail is:

devvyk@earthlink.net

YES! This should be read by EVERY woman.

•November 13, 2008 • Leave a Comment

WHY WOMEN ARE SO CRAZY” A BOOK REVIEW

by Alan Stang
November 13, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

 

[Announcement: Did you know Alan Stang has a new radio show?

 Not Holier Than Thou, my study of the homosexual penetration of the Republican Party, which the Love Priestess (my wife) insisted I write. I had no idea when I started Women that it would become something of a sociological document that proves a thesis. That it certainly proves mine you will see in the comments of the ladies who respond, which I believe is alone worth the modest price of admission.

The title is Why Women Are So Crazy: Not In Their Place (Houston, Patton House, 2008). Like one of my other books, Scumbags I Have Known and Other Profundities, this new one is a compendium of magazine pieces I have done on the subject for years. They originally appeared here and elsewhere around the vast internet. Now I have assembled and expanded them so you will have everything in one place.

 

The book is about the worst thing that has ever happened to our country, the worst thing the conspiracy has done to us, worse even than Lincoln’s Communist War to Destroy the Union, worse than all the wars the conspirators have tricked us into, worse than Nine Eleven, worse than the recent, completely engineered collapse of our economy, worse than the invasion of illegal aliens they are conducting, even worse than the conspiracy’s attempt to submerge our country in a world government and the election of an illegal alien as President.
 

Surely nothing could be worse than all those things. What is it? It’s feminism. Feminism is worse than any and all of them because, while some of these others certainly have fomented mindless horror and revolutionary change that has killed millions, feminism seeks a change in the cultural and social DNA, a change in the matrix from which there could be no return. The result would be a society of mutants, quite different from the humanity we know.
 

Women
 

Some readers may recall that Women is a companion volume to

 

republicbroadcasting.org and click on Listen Live. Call in is 800 313-9443. If you can’t listen at that time, do so via the archives, which are free. I’ll be talking about the various manifestations of the conspiracy for world government, its tactics, such as the illegal alien invasion, its purposes and its players, from Jorge W. Boosh on down.]

Perhaps recognizing how much I love women, they trust me enough to take us into their personal lives. Each has a different take on “women’s liberation,” some poignant, some inspiring. Because they are real women, not sociological concoctions, all of them offer unimpeachable testimony. It is impossible to argue with their experience. It will show you that today’s American women are the targets of a brilliantly conceived and implemented propaganda scheme designed to demolish our country.
 

My hope is that the more people of both sexes who recognize what is deliberately being done to us, the better the chance we have to stop it before it becomes irrevocable and plunges us into a new genetic black hole that would take centuries to close. The awareness and spirit of the ladies who speak in my book is reason to hope, because, one after another, they recognize that “women’s liberation” produces the opposite.
 

Why Women Are So Crazy

 

There is a chapter on the medical differences between the sexes. Even a few years ago, it would have been redundant; everyone knew the difference. Today it is necessary, because an essential womanoid theory holds that the sexes are interchangeable and therefore should be treated the same. But according to the longtime female ob/gyn whose book we cite, vive la différence!

There is a chapter on the Communist background of the womanoid movement. Its purpose of course is to drag women from their homes, in order to destroy the family. Communist theoretician Simone de Beauvoir, whom all womanoids revere, explains that in the Communist system she propounds women would not be allowed the choice of staying at home. So feminism has nothing to do with women’s liberation. On the contrary, it amounts to female suppression.
 

In Women, you will feast on the literally insane musings of today’s leading feminist “thinkers,” including lifelong CIA agent Gloria Steinem, who wants to overthrow everything, Valerie Solana, founder of SCUM (Society for Cutting Up Men) and Cathy MacKinnon, who says men want to humiliate and kill women, and that “death is the ultimate sexual act.” Cathy is a professor of law, which means she is not only non compus mentis, she is metastasizing.
 

Here, too, you will meet Betty Friedan, a lifelong Red, who joined the Young Communist League, wrote for the Daily Worker, the official newspaper of the Communist Party and worked for a Communist Party union for years, none of which our Communist media have told you. Betty postured as a frustrated housewife; in fact, she wrote The Feminine Mystique in a luxurious mansion on the Hudson. Betty is the only leading womanoid I actually met. We sat together for a couple of hours at a couple of Democrat National Conventions. She talked volubly, but, sadly, both times she was too drunk to quote, and once would have fallen on her face had I not grabbed her when she stood up.
 

Another chapter dissects the infamous “Playboy Philosophy,” under which a woman is encouraged to adopt the sexuality of a man, sterility and genital warts. Such fun! There is a discussion of the conspiracy’s victimization of the black woman and an exposé of women at war, a disaster that could emasculate our military at a time when we need it most.
 

There is a chapter on Ronald Reagan and Dick Cheney, from a perspective that may be new to you, and another on erstwhile First Daughter Chelsea Clinton’s night on the town campaigning in lesbian Philadelphia. There is a discussion of the kidnapping of hundreds of children by the state of Texas.
 

 

 

A final chapter explains the best deal women ever got, and, at no additional charge, a fool proof way to restore and preserve your marriage. Because we are presently inundated by Muslim propaganda, there is an appendix by Dr. Peter Hammond of Frontline Fellowship on the treatment of women in Islam. Another cites French observer Alexis de Tocqueville’s finding that the American experiment is such a success because Americans have the best women. And, as promised, in an appendix headed “The Last Word,” the Love Priestess gets the last word.

 

 

 

Here is the cover of Why Women Are So Crazy. The pensive young lady depicted is somebody’s daughter. Is she wondering how she got into this mess? My prayer is that she did not fall into the hands of the monsters who killed Daniel Pearl of the Wall Street Journal, and other victims.

 

[

Announcement: Alan Stang’s new radio show, The Sting of Stang, will debut on Monday, July 14th, 7 to 8 a.m., Central, M-F, via Republic Broadcasting Network. To listen, go to

Announcement: Alan Stang’s new radio show, The Sting of Stang, will debut on Monday, July 14th, 7 to 8 a.m., Central, M-F, via Republic Broadcasting Network. To listen, go to
 

Alan Stang was one of Mike Wallace’s original writers at Channel 13 in New York, where he wrote some of the scripts that sent Mike to CBS. Stang has been a radio talk show host himself. In Los Angeles, he went head to head nightly with Larry King, and, according to Arbitron, had almost twice as many listeners. He has been a foreign correspondent. He has written hundreds of feature magazine articles in national magazines and some fifteen books, for which he has won many awards, including a citation from the Pennsylvania House of Representatives for journalistic excellence. One of Stang’s exposés stopped a criminal attempt to seize control of New Mexico, where a gang seized a court house, held a judge hostage and killed a deputy. The scheme was close to success before Stang intervened. Another Stang exposé inspired major reforms in federal labor legislation.
 

His first book, It’s Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights, was an instant best-seller. His first novel, The Highest Virtue, set in the Russian Revolution, won smashing reviews and five stars, top rating, from the West Coast Review of Books, which gave five stars in only one per cent of its reviews.
 

Stang has lectured in every American state and around the world and has guested on many top shows, including CNN’s Cross Fire. Because he and his wife had the most kids in Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic, where they lived at the time, the entire family was chosen to be actors in “Havana,” directed by Sydney Pollack and starring Robert Redford, the most expensive movie ever made (at the time). Alan Stang is the man in the ridiculous Harry Truman shirt with the pasted-down hair. He says they made him do it.

 

Website:

E-Mail:

Like the genuine woman, the womanoid tends to present a more pronounced forecastle and afterdeck. For that reason, the real thing can often be mistaken for the perversion – from a distance.

 
A woman is to a womanoid as a human is to a humanoid. Up close of course, no mistake is possible, however similar the superficialities, as soon as the creature opens its mouth. The book explains all this. For instance, Women has already proven its value as a kind of litmus test that can ascertain how much true womanhood is present. Here is an example, from a womanoid critic: “Your disgusting article was sent to me by a male friend who politely referred to you as a Neanderthal. Half way through I wanted to vomit.” From there, the letter goes on to new heights, or depths. It’s all in the book. But the author does not tell us whether she actually threw up.
 

Click here for details.]

WE AS AMERICAN’S CANNOT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN! PLEASE FORWARD

•November 12, 2008 • Leave a Comment

LAWSUIT CONTINUES OVER OBAMA’S BIRTH RECORDS

 

By NWV News Director, Jim Kouri
November 10, 2008

©

 

Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Pennsylvania attorney who filed a lawsuit suit against Barack H. Obama, challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, filed a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. Berg is taking legal action in order to view President-Elect Barack Obama‘s birth certificate and other similar documents.

Surprisingly, no one has seen Obama’s birth records

and any effort to view them has been

and any effort to view them has been

and any effort to view them has been

Mr. Berg told NewsWithView.Com, “I look forward to receiving Defendant Obama’s response to the Writ and am hopeful the US Supreme Court will review Berg v. Obama. I believe Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally-qualified natural-born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of President of the United States.”
 

Mr. Berg’s case, Berg vs. Obama was dismissed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Docket # 08-cv-4083 for lack of standing. Mr. Berg filed a Writ of Certiorari for review of the case and an injunction to stay the election pending review. Justice Souter denied the injunction. It is expected that the Court will decide whether or not to review Berg v. Obama after the Defendants file their response, and Mr. Berg has replied to the Defendant’s response.

Berg said, “I [was] totally disappointed by Judge Surrick’s decision and, for all citizens of the United States… I immediately appealed to the US Supreme Court.”

 

This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution

. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States – the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world – then who does?”
 

So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned, Berg added, “According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution. What happened to ‘…Government of the people, by the people, for the people,…’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.
 

We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.
 

The

“When Arnold Schwarzenegger ran for — and won — the governorship of California, many in the liberal Republican establishment and the new media lamented the fact that he was not an American-born citizen and therefore was ineligible to run for president of this nation. Now it seems these same people are looking the other way to avoid exposing Senator Obama as an unconstitutional presidential candidate,” said political consultant Mike Baker in an interview with NewswithViews.com.
 

Berg, the plaintiff stated in court papers that he is a life long Democrat who had always been proud of his Party: Plaintiff is a licensed attorney in good standing and has taken an oath to uphold the United States Constitution. Plaintiff and many other citizens of the United States have donated money and time to Democratic Presidential candidates as well as to the Democratic National Committee, in reliance on promises and assurances made by the DNC in the Democratic Party Agenda. It provides that the Democrat Party’s goals, among others, are to “restore accountability, honesty and openness at all levels of government”, to “restore the Constitution and protect the civil rights and liberties of all Americans” and to “uphold the Constitution.” To uphold the Constitution includes making sure that the Presidential candidate is eligible to serve as President pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of our United States Constitution and that such candidate runs a fair and legitimate campaign.
 

 

 

In vetting the Presidential candidate the DNC and FEC are required to ensure the eligibility requirements pursuant to our Constitution are met and the Presidential candidate, if elected, would be eligible to serve as President. To be eligible and qualified to run for and/or serve for Office of the President of the United States a person must be a “natural born” citizen.

 

United States Constitution, Article II, Section I. The natural born citizen clause has prohibited many prominent Americans from becoming President, including Governor Schwarzenegger and former Secretaries of State Madeleine Albright and Henry Kissinger.
 

 

 

The DNC has nominated Obama as the Democratic candidate for President of the United States. There are many unanswered questions regarding Obama’s citizenship status:

 

1.

Is Obama a “natural born” United States citizen?
2. Is Obama a “naturalized” United States citizen?
3.

The Defendants’ response is due by December 1st and Mr. Berg’s reply will be submitted thereafter.

© 2008 NWV – All Rights Reserved

thwarted by his campaign and the so-called mainstream news media.

Berg’s writ requests review of the United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge Surrick’s dismissal of Philip J. Berg’s lawsuit against Barack H. Obama, Jr., the Democrat National Committee and the other co-Defendants.

According to court documents

, the US Supreme Court has set dates in which Barack Obama, the DNC and all co-Defendants are to respond to the Writ, which is on or before December 1, 2008.

US Constitution stipulates: “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States…”

Obama MUST either disclose, or step down!

•November 10, 2008 • Leave a Comment

 

 

 

 

 

OBAMA MUST STAND UP NOW OR STEP DOWN  

 

By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
October 29, 2008

NewsWithViews.com

 

America is facing potentially the gravest constitutional crisis in her history. Barack Obama must either stand up in a public forum and prove, with conclusive documentary evidence, that he is “a natural born Citizen” of the United States who has not renounced his American citizenship—or he must step down as the Democratic Party’s candidate for President of the United States—preferably before the election is held, and in any event before the Electoral College meets. Because, pursuant to the Constitution, only “a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of th[e] Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). And Obama clearly was not “a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of th[e] Constitution.”

Whether the evidence will show that Obama is, or is not, “a natural born Citizen” who has never renounced his American citizenship is an open question. The arguments on both sides are as yet speculative. But Obama’s stubborn refusal to provide what he claims is “his own” country with conclusive proof on that score compels the presumption that he knows, or at least strongly suspects, that no sufficient evidence in his favor exists. After all, he is not being pressed to solve a problem in quantum physics that is “above his pay grade,” but only asked to provide the public with the original copy of some official record that establishes his citizenship. The vast majority of Americans could easily do so. Why will Obama not dispel the doubts about his eligibility—unless he can not?

Now that Obama’s citizenship has been seriously questioned, the burden of proof rests squarely on his shoulders. The “burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States * * * is upon those making the claim.” Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640, 653 (1948). And if each of the General Government’s powers must be proven (not simply presumed) to exist, then every requirement that the Constitution sets for any individual’s exercise of those powers must also be proven (not simply presumed) to be fully satisfied before that individual may exercise any of those powers. The Constitution’s command that “[n]o Person except a natural born Citizen * * * shall be eligible to the Office of President” is an absolute prohibition against the exercise of each and every Presidential power by certain unqualified individuals. Actually (not simply presumptively or speculatively) being “a natural born Citizen” is the condition precedent sine qua non for avoiding this prohibition. Therefore, anyone who claims eligibility for “the Office of President” must, when credibly challenged, establish his qualifications in this regard with sufficient evidence.

In disposing of the lawsuit Berg v. Obama, which squarely presents the question of Obama’s true citizenship, the presiding judge complained that Berg “would have us derail the democratic process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions of people voted and who underwent excessive vetting during what was one of the most hotly contested presidential primary in living memory.”

This is exceptionally thin hogwash. A proper judicial inquiry into Obama’s eligibility for “the Office of President” will not deny his supporters a “right” to vote for him—rather, it will determine whether they have any such “right” at all. For, just as Obama’s “right” to stand for election to “the Office of President” is contingent upon his being “a natural born Citizen,” so too are the “rights” of his partisans to vote for him contingent upon whether he is even eligible for that “Office.”

If Obama is ineligible, then no one can claim any “right” to vote for him. Indeed, in that case every American who does vote has a constitutional duty to vote against him. The judge in Berg v. Obama dismissed the case, not because Obama has actually proven that he is eligible for “the Office of President,” but instead because, simply as a voter, Berg supposedly lacks “standing” to challenge Obama’s eligibility:

regardless of questions of causation, the grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact. * ** [A] candidate’s ineligibility under the Natural Born Citizen Clause does not result in an injury in fact to voters. By extension, the theoretical constitutional harm experienced by voters does not change as the candidacy of an allegedly ineligible candidate progresses from the primaries to the general election.

This pronouncement does not rise to the level of hogwash. First, the Constitution mandates that “[t]he judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution” (Article III, Section 2, Clause 1). Berg’s suit plainly “aris[es] under th[e] Constitution,” in the sense of raising a critical constitutional issue. So the only question is whether his suit is a constitutional “Case[ ].” The present judicial test for whether a litigant’s claim constitutes a constitutional “Case[ ]” comes under the rubric of “standing”—a litigant with “standing” may proceed; one without “standing” may not. “Standing,” however, is not a term found anywhere in the Constitution. Neither are the specifics of the doctrine of “standing,” as they have been elaborated in judicial decision after judicial decision, to be found there. Rather, the test for “standing” is almost entirely a judicial invention.

True enough, the test for “standing” is not as ridiculous as the judiciary’s so-called “compelling governmental interest test,” which licenses public officials to abridge individuals’ constitutional rights and thereby exercise powers the Constitution withholds from those officials, which has no basis whatsoever in the Constitution, and which is actually anti-constitutional. Neither is the doctrine of “standing” as abusive as the “immunities” judges have cut from whole cloth for public officials who violate their constitutional “Oath[s] or Affirmation[s], to support this Constitution”

(Article VI, Clause 3)—in the face of the Constitution’s explicit limitation on official immunities (Article I, Section 6, Clause 1). For the Constitution does require that a litigant must present a true “Case[ ].” Yet, because the test for “standing” is largely a contrivance of all-too-fallible men and women, its specifics can be changed as easily as they were adopted, when they are found to be faulty. And they must be changed if the consequences of judicial ignorance, inertia, and inaction are not to endanger America’s constitutional form of government. Which is precisely the situation here, inasmuch as the purported “election” of Obama as President, notwithstanding his ineligibility for that office, not only will render illegitimate the Executive Branch of the General Government, but also will render impotent its Legislative Branch (as explained below).

Second, the notion upon which the judge in Berg v. Obama fastened—namely, that Berg’s “grievance remains too generalized to establish the existence of an injury in fact,” i.e., if everyone is injured or potentially injured then no one has “standing”—is absurd on its face.

To be sure, no one has yet voted for Obama in the general election. But does that mean that no one in any group smaller than the general pool of America’s voters in its entirety has suffered specific harm from Obama’s participation in the electoral process to date? Or will suffer such harm from his continuing participation? What about the Democrats who voted for Hillary Clinton as their party’s nominee, but were saddled with Obama because other Democrats voted for him even though they could not legally have done so if his lack of eligibility for “the Office of President” had been judicially determined before the Democratic primaries or convention?

What about the States that have registered Obama as a legitimate candidate for President, but will have been deceived, perhaps even defrauded, if he is proven not to be “a natural born Citizen”? And as far as the general election is concerned, what about the voters among erstwhile Republicans and Independents who do not want John McCain as President, and therefore will vote for Obama (or any Democrat, for that matter) as “the lesser of two evils,” but who later on may have their votes effectively thrown out, and may have to suffer McCain’s being declared the winner of the election, if Obama’s ineligibility is established? Or what about those voters who made monetary contributions to Obama’s campaign, but may at length discover that their funds went, not only to an ineligible candidate, but to one who knew he was ineligible?

These obvious harms pale into insignificance, however, compared to the national disaster of having an outright usurper purportedly “elected” as “President.” In this situation, it is downright idiocy to claim, as did the judge in Berg v. Obama, that a “generalized” injury somehow constitutes no judicially cognizable injury at all. Self-evidently, to claim that a “generalized” grievance negates “the existence of an injury in fact” is patently illogical—for if everyone in any group can complain of the same harm of which any one of them can complain, then the existence of some harm cannot be denied; and the more people who can complain of that harm, the greater the aggregate or cumulative seriousness of the injury. The whole may not be greater than the sum of its parts; but it is at least equal to that sum! Moreover, for a judge to rule that no injury redressable in a court of law exists, precisely because everyone in America will be subjected to an individual posing as “the President” but who constitutionally cannot be (and therefore is not) the President, sets America on the course of judicially assisted political suicide. If Obama turns out to be nothing more than an usurper who has fraudulently seized control of the Presidency, not only will the Constitution have been egregiously flouted, but also this whole country could be, likely will be, destroyed as a consequence. And if this country is even credibly threatened with destruction, every American will be harmed—irretrievably, should the threat become actuality—including those who voted or intend to vote for Obama, who are also part of We the People. Therefore, in this situation, any and every American must have “standing” to demand—and must demand, both in judicial fora and in the fora of public opinion—that Obama immediately and conclusively prove himself eligible for “the Office of President.”

Utterly imbecilic as an alternative is the judge’s prescription in Berg v. Obama that, [i]f, through the political process, Congress determines that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency, then it is free to pass laws conferring standing on individuals like [Berg]. Until that time, voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that [Berg] attempts to bring * * * .

Recall that this selfsame judge held that Berg has no constitutional “Case[ ]” because he has no “standing,” and that he has no “standing” because he has no “injury in fact,” only a “generalized” “grievance.” This purports to be a finding of constitutional law: namely, that constitutionally no “Case[ ]” exists. How, then, can Congress constitutionally grant “standing” to individuals such as Berg, when the courts (assuming the Berg decision is upheld on appeal) have ruled that those individuals have no “standing”? If “standing” is a constitutional conception, and the courts deny that “standing” exists in a situation such as this, and the courts have the final say as to what the Constitution means—then Congress lacks any power to contradict them. Congress cannot instruct the courts to exercise jurisdiction beyond what the Constitution includes within “the judicial Power.”

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 173-180 (1803).

In fact, though, a Congressional instruction is entirely unnecessary. Every American has what lawyers call “an implied cause of action”—directly under Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the Constitution—to require that anyone standing for “the Office of President” must verify his eligibility for that position, at least when serious allegations have been put forward that he is not eligible, and he has otherwise refused to refute those allegations with evidence that should be readily available if he is eligible. That “Case[ ]” is one the Constitution itself defines. And the Constitution must be enforceable in such a “Case[ ]” in a timely manner, by anyone who cares to seek enforcement, because of the horrendous consequences that will ensue if it is flouted.

What are some of those consequences?

First

, if Obama is not “a natural born Citizen” or has renounced such citizenship, he is simply not eligible for “the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). That being so, he cannot be “elected” by the voters, by the Electoral College, or by the House of Representatives (see Amendment XII). For neither the voters, nor the Electors, nor Members of the House can change the constitutional requirement, even by unanimous vote inter sese (see Article V). If, nonetheless, the voters, the Electors, or the Members of the House purport to “elect” Obama, he will be nothing but an usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such. And he can never become anything else, because an usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation.

Second

, if Obama dares to take the Presidential “Oath or Affirmation” of office, knowing that he is not “a natural born Citizen,” he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for “the Office of President, he cannot “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,” or even execute it at all, to any degree. Thus, his very act of taking the “Oath or Affirmation” will be a violation thereof! So, even if the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the “Oath or Affirmation,” Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it.

Third

, his purported “Oath or Affirmation” being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped “Office of President” will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242, which provides that:[w]hoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States * * * shall be fined * * * or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined * * * or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, * * *, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined * * * or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Plainly enough, every supposedly “official” act performed by an usurper in the President’s chair will be an act “under color of law” that necessarily and unavoidably “subjects [some] person * * * to the deprivation of [some] rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution * * * of the United States”—in the most general case, of the constitutional “right[ ]” to an eligible and duly elected individual serving as President, and the corresponding constitutional “immunit[y]” from subjection to an usurper pretending to be “the President.”

Fourth

, if he turns out to be nothing but an usurper acting in the guise of “the President,” Obama will not constitutionally be the “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States” (see Article II, Section 2, Clause 1). Therefore, he will be entitled to no obedience whatsoever from anyone in those forces. Indeed, for officers or men to follow any of his purported “orders” will constitute a serious breach of military discipline—and in extreme circumstances perhaps even “war crimes.” In addition, no one in any civilian agency in the Executive Branch of the General Government will be required to put into effect any of Obama’s purported “proclamations,” “executive orders,” or “directives.”

Fifth

, as nothing but an usurper (if he becomes one), Obama will have no conceivable authority “to make Treaties”, or to “nominate, and * * * appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not * * * otherwise provided for [in the Constitution]” (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2). And therefore any “Treaties” or “nominat[ions], and * * * appoint[ments]” he purports to “make” will be void ab initio, no matter what the Senate does, because the Senate can neither authorize an usurper to take such actions in the first place, nor thereafter ratify them. One need not be a lawyer to foresee what further, perhaps irremediable, chaos must ensue if an usurper, even with “the Advice and Consent of the Senate”, unconstitutionally “appoint[s] * * * Judges of the Supreme Court” whose votes thereafter make up the majorities that wrongly decide critical “Cases” of constitutional law.

Sixth

, and perhaps most importantly, Congress can pass no law while an usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.” The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to an usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”

Seventh,

if Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4). In that case, some other public officials would have to arrest him—with physical force, if he would not go along quietly—in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture. Obviously, this could possibly lead to armed conflicts within the General Government itself, or among the States and the people.

Eighth

, even did something approaching civil war not eventuate from Obama’s hypothetical usurpation, if the Establishment allowed Obama to pretend to be “the President,” and the people acquiesced in that charade, just about everything that was done during his faux “tenure in office” by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the General Government, and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned when a constitutional President was finally installed in office. The potential for chaos, both domestically and internationally, arising out of this systemic uncertainty is breathtaking.The underlying problem will not be obviated if Obama, his partisans in the Democratic Party, and his cheerleaders and cover-up artists in the big media simply stonewall the issue of his (non)citizenship and contrive for him to win the Presidential election. The cat is already out of the bag and running all over the Internet. If he continues to dodge the issue, Obama will be dogged with this question every day of his purported “Presidency.” And inevitably the truth will out. For the issue is too simple, the evidence (or lack of it) too accessible. Either Obama can prove that he is “a natural born Citizen” who has not renounced his citizenship; or he cannot. And he will not be allowed to slip through with some doctored “birth certificate” generated long after the alleged fact.

On a matter this important, Americans will demand that, before its authenticity is accepted, any supposed documentary evidence of that sort be subjected to reproducible forensic analyses conducted by reputable, independent investigators and laboratories above any suspicion of being influenced by or colluding with any public official, bureaucracy, political party, or other special-interest organization whatsoever.

 

 

 

 

 

Berg v. Obama may very well end up in the Supreme Court. Yet that ought to be unnecessary. For Obama’s moral duty is to produce the evidence of his citizenship sua sponte et instanter. Otherwise, he will be personally responsible for all the consequences of his refusal to do so.

 

Of course, if Obama knows that he is not “a natural born Citizen” who never renounced his American citizenship, then he also knows that he and his henchmen have perpetrated numerous election-related frauds throughout the country—the latest, still-ongoing one a colossal swindle targeting the American people as a whole. If that is the case, his refusal “to be a witness against himself” is perfectly explicable and even defensible on the grounds of the Fifth Amendment. Howsoever justified as a matter of criminal law, though, Obama’s silence and inaction will not obviate the necessity for him to prove his eligibility for “the Office of President.” The Constitution may permit him to “take the Fifth;” but it will not suffer him to employ that evasion as a means to usurp the Presidency of the United States.

© 2008 Edwin Vieira, Jr. – All Rights Reserve

 

 

 

Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School).

For more than thirty years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, and Communications Workers of America v. Beck, which established constitutional and statutory limitations on the uses to which labor unions, in both the private and the public sectors, may apply fees extracted from nonunion workers as a condition of their employment.

He has written numerous monographs and articles in scholarly journals, and lectured throughout the county. His most recent work on money and banking is the two-volume

 

Pieces of Eight

: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution (2002), the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective.

 

 

 

www.piecesofeight.us

He is also the co-author (under a nom de plume) of the political novel

 

 

CRA$HMAKER

: A Federal Affaire (2000), a not-so-fictional story of an engineered crash of the Federal Reserve System, and the political upheaval it causes.

 

 

www.crashmaker.com

 

How To Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary

” … and

 

 

Constitutional “Homeland Security,

” Volume One, The Nation in Arms… He can be reached at: 13877 Napa Drive
Manassas, Virginia 20112

 

 

 

 

 

The FED is sticking it to the American people AGAIN!

•November 10, 2008 • Leave a Comment

Fed Defies Transparency Aim in Refusal to Disclose

By Mark Pittman, Bob Ivry and Alison Fitzgerald
 

Nov. 10 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve is refusing to identify the recipients of almost $2 trillion of emergency loans from American taxpayers or the troubled assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.
Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said in September they would comply with congressional demands for transparency in a $700 billion bailout of the banking system. Two months later, as the Fed lends far more than that in separate rescue programs that didn’t require approval by Congress, Americans have no idea where their money is going or what securities the banks are pledging in return.
“The collateral is not being adequately disclosed, and that’s a big problem,” said Dan Fuss, vice chairman of Boston-based Loomis Sayles & Co., where he co-manages $17 billion in bonds. “In a liquid market, this wouldn’t matter, but we’re not. The market is very nervous and very thin.”
Bloomberg News has requested details of the Fed lending under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act and filed a federal lawsuit Nov. 7 seeking to force disclosure. The Fed made the loans under terms of 11 programs, eight of them created in the past 15 months, in the midst of the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression.
“It’s your money; it’s not the Fed’s money,” said billionaire Ted Forstmann, senior partner of Forstmann Little & Co. in New York. “Of course there should be transparency.”
Federal Reserve spokeswoman Michelle Smith declined to comment on the loans or the Bloomberg lawsuit. Treasury spokeswoman Michele Davis didn’t respond to a phone call and an e-mail seeking comment.

 

$2 Trillion

- The Fed’s lending is significant because the central bank has stepped into a rescue role that was also the purpose of the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, bailout plan — without safeguards put into the TARP legislation by Congress.

Total Fed lending topped $2 trillion for the first time last week and has risen by 140 percent, or $1.172 trillion, in the seven weeks since Fed governors relaxed the collateral standards on Sept. 14. The difference includes a $788 billion increase in loans to banks through the Fed and $474 billion in other lending, mostly through the central bank’s purchase of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds. Before Sept. 14, the Fed accepted mostly top-rated government and asset-backed securities as collateral. After that date, the central bank widened standards to accept other kinds of securities, some with lower ratings. The Fed collects interest on all its loans.

`We Need Transparency’ –

The plan to purchase distressed securities through TARP called for buying at the “lowest price that the secretary (of the Treasury) determines to be consistent with the purposes of this Act,” according to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the law that covers TARP. The legislation didn’t require any specific method for the purchases beyond saying mechanisms such as auctions or reverse auctions should be used “when appropriate.” In a reverse auction, bidders offer to sell securities at successively lower prices, helping to ensure that the Fed would pay less. The measure also included a five-member oversight board that includes Paulson and Bernanke. At a Sept. 23 Senate Banking Committee hearing in Washington, Paulson called for transparency in the purchase of distressed assets under the TARP program. “We need oversight,” Paulson told lawmakers. “We need protection. We need transparency. I want it. We all want it.”

Banks Resist Disclosure –

At a joint House-Senate hearing the next day, Bernanke also stressed the importance of openness in the program. “Transparency is a big issue,” he said. The Fed lent cash and government bonds to banks, which gave the Fed collateral in the form of equities and debt, including subprime and structured securities such as collateralized debt obligations, according to the Fed Web site. The borrowers have included the now-bankrupt Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. Banks oppose any release of information because it might signal weakness and spur short-selling or a run by depositors, said Scott Talbott, senior vice president of government affairs for the Financial Services Roundtable, a Washington trade group.

Frank Backs Fed – “You have to balance the need for transparency with protecting the public interest,” Talbott said. “Taxpayers have a right to know where their tax dollars are going, but one piece of information standing alone could undermine public confidence in the system.”
The nation’s biggest banks, Citigroup, Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley, declined to comment on whether they have borrowed money from the Fed. They received $120 billion in capital from the TARP, which was signed into law Oct. 3.
In an interview Nov. 6, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said the Fed’s disclosure is sufficient and that the risk the central bank is taking on is appropriate in the current economic climate. Frank said he has discussed the program with Timothy F. Geithner, president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and a possible candidate to succeed Paulson as Treasury secretary.
“I talk to Geithner and he was pretty sure that they’re OK,” said Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. “If the risk is that the Fed takes a little bit of a haircut, well that’s regrettable.” Such losses would be acceptable, he said, if the program helps revive the economy.

`Unclog the Market’ –

Frank said the Fed shouldn’t reveal the assets it holds or how it values them because of “delicacy with respect to pricing.” He said such disclosure would “give people clues to what your pricing is and what they might be able to sell us and what your estimates are.” He wouldn’t say why he thought that information would be problematic.
Revealing how the Fed values collateral could help thaw frozen credit markets, said Ron D’Vari, chief executive officer of New Oak Capital LLC in New York and the former head of structured finance at Black Rock Inc.
“I’d love to hear the methodology, how the Fed priced the assets,” D’Vari said. “That would unclog the market very quickly.”

TARP’s $700 billion so far is being used to buy preferred shares in banks to shore up their capital. The program was originally intended to hold banks’ troubled assets while markets were frozen.
AIG Lending – The Bloomberg lawsuit argues that the collateral lists “are central to understanding and assessing the government’s response to the most cataclysmic financial crisis in America since the Great Depression.”
The Fed has lent at least $81 billion to American International Group Inc., the world’s largest insurer, so that it can pay obligations to banks. AIG today said it received an expanded government rescue package valued at more than $150 billion. The central bank is also responsible for losses on a $26.8 billion portfolio guaranteed after Bear Stearns Cos. was bought by JPMorgan. “As a taxpayer, it is absolutely important that we know how they’re lending money and who they’re lending it to,” said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Arlington, Virginia-based Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.
Ultimately, the Fed will have to remove some securities held as collateral from some programs because the central bank’s rules call for instruments rated below investment grade to be taken back by the borrower and marked down in value. Losses on those assets could then be written off, partly through the capital recently injected into those banks by the Treasury.

Ratings Cuts –

Moody’s Investors Service alone has cut its ratings on 926 mortgage-backed securities worth $42 billion to junk from investment grade since Sept. 14, making them ineligible for collateral on some Fed loans. The Fed’s collateral “absolutely should be made public,” said Mark Cuban, an activist investor, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks professional basketball team and the creator of the Web site BailoutSleuth.com, which focuses on the secrecy shrouding the Fed’s moves.

The Bloomberg lawsuit is Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 08-CV-9595, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

To contact the reporters on this story: Mark Pittman in New York at

To contact the reporters on this story: Mark Pittman in New York at
Bob Ivry in New York at

mpittman@bloomberg.net;bivry@bloomberg.net; Alison Fitzgerald in Washington at afitzgerald2@bloomberg.net.

War Plan Collapses, George Buch Crushed!

•October 31, 2008 • 2 Comments

ELECTION WAR PLAN COLLAPSES

Bush Crushed By Failure

by

October 28, 2008

A plan to ignite nuclear war in the Middle East a week before U.S. elections collapsed on Friday in a crushing defeat for George Bush, Dick Cheney and their Big Oil masters in Houston. The mission was the invasion of Iran and the seizure of Iranian oil fields triggered by false-flag nukes blamed on Iran. This has been Houston’s ultimate objective since installing Bush and Cheney in the White House eight years ago.

The plan surfaced only four weeks ago as outlined in our last report,

Gambit Reloaded – All Set to Nuke Iran. In that report, we saw the first evidence of the new power structure which will control the U.S. after January, as the great Rothschild Banking Leviathan forced the White House to delay implementation of the war plan until the Banker Bail-Out was approved by Congress. (Yes, Obama is the Rothschild candidate, just like FDR, as history repeats itself.)

A Bush speech reversal, DOSE THE WIN, had indicated that he was hoping that nukes popping off in the Middle East would influence the November voting or perhaps poison the whole electoral process in some way. But in the cloud of near-total illusion that dominates world affairs today it is rarely easy to identify true objectives, or even the players themselves. Bush may have been hoping to retain the White House and Pentagon for the Oil Cartel or he may have been instructed to honor some previous agreement between Houston and London (?) to help with an Obama landslide victory – a possible backlash against Bush’s fondness for war. The White House certainly did all it could to protect and foster the long-running plot to turn the financial world upside-down, so there is reason to believe that cooperation between these two great monopolies is relatively high.

Ken Welch in Houston

 

CLICK
HERE

TO
LISTEN

REVERSED SPEECH

George Bush
At National Security Agency
October 24, 2008
 

See Original Video

Reversals featured in this sound clip

Fwd: I want to thank General Alexander..
Rev: THEY CANCEL – THEY SAY CANCEL (overlapping reversals)

Fwd: protecting the American People..
Rev: DISASTER FOR NOW – RETIRE ME
(back-to-back reversals)

Fwd: Since 9-11..
Rev: AND THE BATTLE WILL NOT..
Rev: I NEED A BULLET

Fwd: Protect the United States..
Rev: HEY – YOU’RE FUCKED – YOU CAN’T EAT THIS
(consecutive, back-to-back reversals)

You may have noticed from the audio that Junior was so shaken by the news that he could barely get through his two-paragraph speech. In fact, I urge you to view the video by clicking on the link above. Cheney, a mass murderer who’s life work in service to oil industry profits is going down in flames, spends the time staring at the floor. The weird little guy on the right, Mike McConnell, looks like he might burst into tears at any moment.

 

 

 

 

It would be interesting to know the size of the bonuses these three men were offered if they could pull off the Iran invasion before their time in office slipped away.

II. So What Happened?

I have reports of greatly increased radio traffic in the Middle East on Thursday and Friday, all involving U.S. military units both on land and sea. This would be consistent with military units reporting their locations and status prior to a really big operation. We can see from the way this played out that the decision to abandon the mission was a military one, rather than a political necessity or some direction from invisible higher authorities. Those issues would have appeared at the White House, and not at the NSA.

We know from the last report that unlike previous attempts, this was a rush operation. Units would have to hurry to be in position and ready to go, although they had almost a full month to do this. I know that seems odd. The fact is that full preparation and positioning for the invasion of a country like Iran takes a lot of time. During other attempts the process moved along at virtually a glacial pace. So the logical and simplest explanation is that U.S. forces were unable to move fast enough to meet the deadline.

We have a number of reversals indicating that there was growing concern that the centerpiece of the basic deception, the Scud missile that was being covertly transported back to its firing position in Iran, might not work. It was a part of the plan that could not be tested. A typical reversal would be FEAR THE MISSILE. But there was no example suggesting that such worries were cause for cancellation. Another possibility is that something happened to it during transport. Something on the missile or the launch vehicle could have been damaged. It could very well have been upside down in some Iranian ditch last Friday morning. This would provide such a strong graphic image, though, that I feel sure it would have shown up in the speech reversals. We do have one set of speech reversals that you can hear below that seem to reference the Scud’s fate. You can decide for yourself about how much should be read into them.

A last minute personal meeting on Wednesday between Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mullen and his Russian counterpart, General Nikolai Makarov provided food for thought. Based on our growing experience with these things, the meeting was held to appraise the Russian military of the date and time that operations would begin, remind them that their leaders had agreed to the plan (for whatever reason) and perhaps reassure them that nukes in the middle east were not a prelude to an attack on Russia. Possibly the Russian military chief might have said no, that they had changed their minds and that Russia would come to Iran’s aid. Yet, this news would have been flashed to the White House earlier in the week, and certainly would have appeared in speech reversals.

One thing that we know for sure is that during the previous ten days a blizzard of news stories appeared in the U.S. and in Israel, all citing urgent reasons for the destruction of Iran. The Iranians are not stupid. In fact, they even visit this website from time to time. It’s quite possible that Iran’s defense readiness was raised so high in response to all this that the invasion would simply have failed.

In the end, all we can really say is that we simply don’t yet know what went wrong. With a little luck the information will show up in a few days and be picked up on our reversed speech radar.

III. Nuclear Tipped Scud Blown Up In The Desert

While it is wonderful to see another Gambit false-flag operation go down in flames, there is particular joy associated with the October failure. It seems like we have been tracking that damned Scud missile with its Russian warhead forever. The reversals indicate that the Pentagon decided not to bring it back this time. They ordered the SEALS who were guarding it to blow it up in place while everyone on the NSA video hook-up watched!

 

CLICK
HERE

TO
LISTEN

REVERSED SPEECH

George Bush
At the NSA (2)
October 24, 2008
 

Reversals featured in this sound clip

Fwd: Opening sentence
Rev: TOXIC – WE BLAST IT – THE FAKE *

Fwd: N.S.A.
Rev: YOU SEEN IT

* Boosted volume and filtering on the word THE for clarity.

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.